<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Toxic Dolls | Stewart Marsh | Activity</title>
	<link>http://toxicdolls.com/members/pipefire6/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="http://toxicdolls.com/members/pipefire6/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Stewart Marsh.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 22:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1a6b122cb26d73afbf23ebaa4c298f1e</guid>
				<title>Stewart Marsh posted an update: INTRODUCTION Some studies suggest celiac artery coverage [&#133;]</title>
				<link>http://toxicdolls.com/activity-2/p/61506/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 10:46:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTRODUCTION Some studies suggest celiac artery coverage during elective endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is safe given sufficient collateralization of visceral organ perfusion from the superior mesenteric artery. However, there is concern that celiac artery coverage may lead to increased risk of foregut or spinal cord&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-61506"><a href="http://toxicdolls.com/activity-2/p/61506/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3fcc954b9388d8a1bc785a941592fd62</guid>
				<title>Stewart Marsh posted an update: 001) for 12 h compared with unprotected control, a threefold [&#133;]</title>
				<link>http://toxicdolls.com/activity-2/p/40704/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:23:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>001) for 12 h compared with unprotected control, a threefold reduction in the attack. In outdoor trials, TFT-PET provided only 16% protection against An. harrisoni Harbach &amp; Manguin (Diptera Culicidae) compared with unprotected collector (P = 0.0213). The TFT-PET vest reduced nonanophelines landing by 1.4-fold compared with the PET control with a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-40704"><a href="http://toxicdolls.com/activity-2/p/40704/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89573425ebb411a3f9081971291d59c3</guid>
				<title>Stewart Marsh became a registered member</title>
				<link>http://toxicdolls.com/activity-2/p/40621/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:53:23 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>